Get a proposal

Respiratory · Clinical trials

Sarcoidosis Clinical Trials

Approved therapies, the pivotal-trial endpoints they were judged on, the magnitude of benefit — and the drugs that failed their endpoints, and why.

Indication overview

About sarcoidosis — and why its trials are hard

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of unknown cause characterised by non-caseating granulomas most often affecting the lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes, but also skin, eyes, heart, liver and nervous system. Presentation ranges from asymptomatic hilar adenopathy to progressive pulmonary fibrosis and life-threatening cardiac or neurologic involvement. Many cases remit spontaneously, complicating trial design. Corticosteroids (prednisone) are the mainstay first-line therapy despite scarce placebo-controlled evidence, with methotrexate, azathioprine and other immunosuppressants used as steroid-sparing agents and anti-TNF antibodies (notably infliximab) reserved for refractory disease. Approved pharmacotherapy specific to sarcoidosis is limited: repository corticotropin injection (Acthar Gel) carries a long-standing FDA indication for symptomatic sarcoidosis. The field is marked by repeated trial disappointments, including ustekinumab and golimumab, which failed to meet their primary endpoints in chronic pulmonary and skin sarcoidosis. Heterogeneity, high spontaneous remission and imperfect endpoints continue to challenge drug development, and no modern targeted biologic has achieved a broad sarcoidosis approval.

Indication
Sarcoidosis
ICD-10-CM
D86.0 — Sarcoidosis of lung

Approved therapies & pivotal evidence

What's been approved — and by how much it moved the endpoint

Drug (brand)ApprovedSettingPivotal trialPrimary endpointMagnitude of benefit
Repository corticotropin injection (Acthar Gel)(unverified) long-standing FDA indication for symptomatic sarcoidosisSymptomatic sarcoidosis (adjunctive/steroid-context use)(unverified) approval predates modern randomised pivotal-trial requirements(unverified)(unverified)

Where trials have failed

Drugs that missed their endpoint — and what contributed

The most instructive lessons in sarcoidosis development come from programmes that failed the endpoint that mattered.

Drug / trialEndpoint outcomeWhat contributed
Ustekinumab and golimumab — Phase 2 randomised trial in chronic pulmonary and/or skin (lupus pernio) sarcoidosis (Judson et al., Eur Respir J 2014)Neither agent met the primary endpoint of improvement in lung function (FVC) or skin disease versus placeboDisease heterogeneity, insensitive endpoints, high placebo/spontaneous improvement rates and possibly inadequate treatment duration
Adalimumab / other anti-TNF and immunomodulators — Small trials in refractory sarcoidosisInconsistent or modest benefit; failed to establish robust disease-modifying efficacy in adequately powered pivotal trialsSmall sample sizes, variable organ involvement and lack of validated, sensitive primary endpoints

Choosing the right endpoint

Primary endpoints that matter in sarcoidosis trials

  • Forced vital capacity (FVC) — Primary lung-function endpoint in pulmonary sarcoidosis trials; often insensitive given slow disease change
  • Corticosteroid dose reduction — Steroid-sparing effect is a clinically important efficacy measure
  • Chest imaging / Scadding stage — Radiographic assessment of parenchymal and nodal involvement
  • Skin (lupus pernio) severity scores — Used in cutaneous sarcoidosis endpoints
  • Patient-reported outcomes / fatigue — Fatigue and quality of life are common but hard-to-quantify secondary endpoints

How iNGENū runs sarcoidosis trials

Physician-led design, built for FDA submission

Endpoint & biomarker strategy

Board-certified specialists design endpoints and patient selection aligned to current FDA guidance for this indication.

FDA-ready data

Built to ICH-GCP and 21 CFR 312.120, with direct FDA submission — data accepted by the FDA, EMA and MHRA.

Faster, lower-cost delivery

~4-week ethics via the TGA CTN scheme, up to 43.5% R&D rebate, and 80–90% below US CRO cost.

Planning a sarcoidosis trial?
Request a fixed-milestone proposal and a tailored endpoint & feasibility summary for this indication.
Request a proposal

Frequently asked questions

Sarcoidosis clinical trials — FAQs

What is first-line treatment for sarcoidosis?
Oral corticosteroids (prednisone) remain first-line despite limited placebo-controlled evidence, with steroid-sparing immunosuppressants and anti-TNF agents used for refractory disease.
Are there drugs approved specifically for sarcoidosis?
Approved options are limited; repository corticotropin injection (Acthar Gel) carries a long-standing indication for symptomatic sarcoidosis. No modern targeted biologic has broad approval.
Why have many sarcoidosis trials failed?
High rates of spontaneous remission, marked disease heterogeneity and insensitive endpoints (like FVC) make it difficult to demonstrate drug efficacy, as seen with ustekinumab and golimumab.

Ready to discuss your sarcoidosis trial?

Talk to our physician-led team about an FDA-ready, cost-efficient trial design.

Request a proposal